12 Comments

  1. Sam Jones says:

    Nice review.
    My twelve-year-old is up to chapter 30 of Familia Romana, and I have lots of thoughts!
    i) People sometimes imply that the course has little explicit grammatical instruction. That isn’t true. The chapters are organized around grammatical points, and there is lots of explicit treatment of grammar. I describe the course as being different from a “grammar and translation” approach in that it is “grammar and reading”. This might or might not appeal.
    ii) As far as the “College Companion”, we found that any clarifying explanations there were actually taken from the “Latine Disco” pamphlet And “Latine Disco” is much cheaper! But we found that more exercises were helpful, so we used other books written to supplement “Familia Romana”, including Roberto Carfagni’s “Nova Exercitia”.
    iii) You’re right that it isn’t a speedy method. There’s a lot of absorb. I have no idea how students could really get everything there if they were expected to finish the book in a year. Two would be pushing it, even for university students, I think.

    1. Hi Sam, thanks for sharing your thoughts! You are right that there is explicit grammatical instruction in Familia Romana; I find that it is on the briefer side, but I think it is easy to supplement with other materials if you so desire. It is important to recognize that a Latin-first approach does not have to mean no grammar.

      I recommend the Companion because it contains Latine Disco plus an overview of grammar and a glossary, but that’s good to know that you have gotten along fine with just Latine Disco.

      I haven’t taught with Familia Romana as my primary textbook, but I know university professors who do. I’m not sure how much they cover per semester. So far I have been using Familia Romana and novellas as extra reading for my students.

  2. Hi Livia, Thank you so much; your blog was so helpful. My oldest started Latin with Henle 1 and is now on Henle 3. And while he is good at Latin, I think he would have appreciated Latin a lot more if we had done LLPSI as a supplement. So I have started my second son on LLPSI instead of Henle 1. I, personally, found Henle grammar also very tough to understand. Is there another Latin grammar resource that you would recommend that explains grammar very well while also being relatively easier to understand? Thanks!

    1. Hi Kitty, apologies for my delay in responding! I have two recommendations for you.

      First there is English Grammar for Students of Latin, which walks you through grammatical concepts in a comprehensible way. Another option would be to use a Latin textbook like Wheelock’s, which I found easier to understand than Henle. Wheelock’s has a good index at the back so you could look up concepts that you or your children are struggling with.

  3. Would I be able to translate Latin texts by completing this book or would I need to continue further studies in Latin?

    1. Hi Jocelyn, this book will introduce you to the most important grammatical concepts and by the end you will theoretically be prepared to read and translate Latin texts. But, as with all Latin textbooks, there can be a steep learning curve from the textbook to the “real world” of ancient Roman texts.

      If you learn and absorb the information in Familia Romana very well, then you should be prepared to read easier Latin texts with the help of commentaries. You can also continue with Roma Aeterna, the sequel to Familia Romana, which includes lightly adapted works of Vergil, Horace, etc. At the end of the day, though, you simply have to persevere and read more and more Latin.

  4. Would you consider Lingua Latina to be equivalent to high school Latin I & II?

    I’ve taught high school Latin with Henle but am considering switching over to LL. I’m just not sure how much to cover in one year for high school students.

    Thank you!

    1. Hi Denise, good question. How much Henle do you usually get through in Latin I and II? From what I remember (it’s been a few years since I have looked at Henle), Familia Romana covers roughly the same material as Henle First Year Latin. When I was in high school, I completed Henle First Year Latin in two years, so I could see Familia Romana working well for Latin I and II.

  5. What is your opinion on Latin by the natural method by William Most? The style is also inductive and very similar to LLPSI

    1. Hi Umar, unfortunately I am not familiar with this resource, but I will add it to my list of Latin textbooks to read and review!

  6. I started teaching Latin at the local seminary about 10 years ago. I greatly opposed to the Lingua Latina of my predecessor. Seminarians major in Philosophy, read many books in translation for Philosophy, and have Aqunias and Augustine and the Vulgate as the meat of their Theology. You must grasp grammar and the connections between words and thoughts.
    My defining recollection was of a student who translated something correctly but got all the grammar wrong.
    Something like “The man is an soldier” in Latin– and he said “well The man is first so it must be the subject (wrong), the verb is “is’ because it can’t be anything else (wrong, there are nominal sentences” and -the big one : Soldier must be the direct object !!!
    But he could read it

    1. I agree that it is critical to teach grammar and syntax! In my opinion there is no perfect textbook; you always have to supplement with something. Currently I teach with Wheelock’s and supplement with more comprehension-focused materials and activities, but if I ever taught with Lingua Latina, I would be supplementing with more intensive grammatical instruction. (There is grammar in Lingua Latina already, of course. It all depends on the teacher, I would say!)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I accept the Privacy Policy