The Irregular Latin Verb Sum (To Be): Conjugation, Uses, & More
The Latin verb sum (“to be”) is one of the most frequently used words in Latin, but it is also highly irregular. This post covers how to conjugate sum, how to use it, and much more.
I’ll start with a quick overview before diving into the particulars. First and foremost, sum is used to express an equivalence between two things or to describe a noun’s characteristics. This is just like in English, where the verb to be tells us who someone is or what they are like.
In the following examples, forms of the verb to be are in bold.
Līvia est magistra. = Livia is a teacher.
Avēs sunt animālia. = Birds are animals.
Estis altī. = You (all) are tall.
Sum is the second most frequently used word in the Latin language, and this makes sense. We need the verb to be to talk about professions, nationalities, familial relationships, classifications, and so many other aspects of identity.
It’s safe to say that Latin will not make much sense if you don’t understand the verb sum. It is everywhere, from the simplest Latin novellas to the most advanced Roman texts.
The concept is simple, but there is a catch: sum is a highly irregular verb. The forms of to be in Latin often look quite unusual, so it is important to be able to recognize them.
Keep reading to learn all you ever wanted to know about the Latin verb sum (and more)!
How To Conjugate the Latin Verb Sum
Just like all Latin verbs, sum must be conjugated. You have already seen a few conjugated forms in the sample sentences above. For instance, est means “he/she/it is”, while sunt means “they are”.
👉 Need a refresher on conjugation? This post will explain everything.
As with any Latin verb, we will start by looking at the principal parts. The principal parts of sum are sum, esse, fuī, futūrus.
The first two principal parts are different from those of other verbs you may have learned. Normally a verb’s second principal part tells you its conjugation, but esse does not have any of the standard infinitive endings.
This is because sum, esse, fuī, futūrus is an irregular verb. In other words, it does not belong to any of the four Latin verb conjugations.
Sum is highly irregular in the present system (the present, future, and imperfect tenses). But luckily, it is completely regular in the perfect system (the perfect, pluperfect, and future perfect tenses).
In the following sections, I will list all the forms of the verb sum. If you are a beginning student, you may want to stop reading after the present, future, and imperfect tenses and jump down to the section on how to use the verb to be in Latin.
Present System (Indicative)
The present system includes the present, future, and imperfect tenses of the indicative mood. These are usually the first three tenses of sum that students learn.
These are also the most irregular tenses of sum, so you will have to do some memorization. But I do have some good news on that front.
Even in the present system, sum follows the expected patterns for active personal endings. That is, sum ends in m, es ends in s, and so forth.
👉 Not sure what this means? Read all about Latin verb personal endings here!
Now let’s look at the present tense of sum and its translation.
PERSON | SINGULAR | PLURAL |
---|---|---|
1 | sum I am | sumus we are |
2 | es you are | estis you (y’all) are |
3 | est he/she/it is | sunt they are |
The present infinitive of sum is esse, which means “to be.”
And here is the future tense of sum and its translation:
PERSON | SINGULAR | PLURAL |
---|---|---|
1 | erō I will be | erimus we will be |
2 | eris you will be | eritis you (y’all) will be |
3 | erit he/she/it will be | erunt they will be |
Finally, here is the imperfect tense of sum and its translation:
PERSON | SINGULAR | PLURAL |
---|---|---|
1 | eram I was | erāmus we were |
2 | erās you were | erātis you (y’all) were |
3 | erat he/she/it was | erant they were |
And there you go. You have now seen the verb to be in Latin in three crucial tenses.
If you are a beginning student, I recommend that you now skip down to the uses of sum.
In a moment we will move on to the perfect tenses, but first we need to look at the present and imperfect subjunctive.
👉 Wondering what the subjunctive is? Read all about this Latin mood!
Present System (Subjunctive)
The present subjunctive is irregular and consists of sī– plus the active personal endings. The imperfect subjunctive, on the other hand, follows the standard rule: add the active personal endings to the present infinitive.
Here are the forms of the present and imperfect subjunctive. Subjunctives are hard to translate in isolation, but the present tense is something like I may be, you may be, etc. The imperfect tense can be translated as I might be, you might be, etc.
Person | Present | Imperfect |
---|---|---|
1 sing. | sim | essem |
2 sing. | sīs | essēs |
3 sing. | sit | esset |
1 plur. | sīmus | essēmus |
2 plur. | sītis | essētis |
3 plur. | sint | essent |
WATCH OUT: There is also an alternative form of the imperfect subjunctive that appears in some ancient authors. It is based on the future infinitive fore (discussed below).
You simply add the active personal endings to fore. Thus we find forem for essem, forēs for essēs, and so forth.
Perfect System (Indicative)
The perfect system includes the perfect, pluperfect, and future perfect tenses of the indicative mood, as well as the perfect and pluperfect tenses of the subjunctive.
Fortunately, the perfect system of the Latin verb to be is completely regular. You simply add the appropriate tense and mood endings to the perfect stem.
The perfect stem, as is standard, can be found by removing ī from the third principal part. This means that the perfect stem of sum is fu-.
Here is a conjugation chart showing the perfect indicative of sum:
PERSON | SINGULAR | PLURAL |
---|---|---|
1 | fuī I was / have been | fuimus we were / have been |
2 | fuistī you were / have been | fuistis you (y’all) were / have been |
3 | fuit he/she/it was / has been | fuērunt / fuēre they were / have been |
And here is the pluperfect indicative of sum:
PERSON | SINGULAR | PLURAL |
---|---|---|
1 | fueram I had been | fuerāmus we had been |
2 | fuerās you had been | fuerātis you (y’all) had been |
3 | fuerat he/she/it had been | fuerant they had been |
And then the future perfect indicative of sum:
PERSON | SINGULAR | PLURAL |
---|---|---|
1 | fuerō I will have been | fuerimus we will have been |
2 | fueris you will have been | fueritis you (y’all) will have been |
3 | fuerit he/she/it will have been | fuerint they will have been |
Perfect System (Subjunctive)
Finally, let’s look at the perfect and pluperfect subjunctive. Just like with the perfect tenses of the indicative, you add the regular perfect and pluperfect subjunctive endings to the perfect stem (fu-).
It is hard to translate subjunctive forms in isolation, but the perfect means something like I may have been, you may have been, etc., while the pluperfect is something like I might have been, you might have been, etc.
Person | Perfect | Pluperfect |
---|---|---|
1 sing. | fuerim | fuissem |
2 sing. | fueris | fuissēs |
3 sing. | fuerit | fuisset |
1 plur. | fuerimus | fuissēmus |
2 plur. | fueritis | fuissētis |
3 plur. | fuerint | fuissent |
Infinitives, Participles, and Imperatives
The verb to be in Latin is highly irregular, as we have seen, but it is also defective. This means that it does not have all of the possible verb forms.
For instance, sum does not have a gerund or a supine. It is also missing some participles and infinitives.
The verb sum has three infinitives:
Tense | Latin Form | Translation |
---|---|---|
Present | esse | to be |
Perfect | fuisse | to have been |
Future | futūrum esse / fore | to be about to be |
Sum only has one surviving participle: futūrus, a, um “about to be, going to be”. This is a future participle. You can tell this from -ūrus, which is the standard future active participial ending.
Sum has both present imperatives and future imperatives.
Person | Present | Future |
---|---|---|
2 sing. | es be! | estō be! (you shall be) |
3 sing. | none | estō he/she/it shall be |
2 plur. | este (y’all) be! | estōte be! (y’all shall be) |
3 plur. | none | suntō they shall be |
Uses of the Latin Verb Sum (To Be)
Now it’s time to look at concrete examples of the Latin verb to be in action. You will notice that the forms of sum appear at the end, middle, and even beginning of the sentence.
In general, verbs in Latin tend to go at the end of the sentence. But sum is a bit irregular in this regard, too. The word order is highly flexible, so don’t be surprised if you spot the verb to be popping up in unlikely places.
To Be (Linking Verb)
The primary use of the verb sum is as a copula or linking verb. In this context, sum links together and equates two nouns or a noun and an adjective.
Amīca mea est fīlia agricolae. = My friend is the daughter of a farmer.
Hic puer altus erit. = This boy will be tall.
Amāre est bonum. = To love is good.
Poēta esse volō. = I want to be a poet.
We can see sum as an equals sign (=). My friend equals the daughter of a farmer; the boy will equal a tall person.
In such circumstances, the noun or adjective linked by sum (the predicate nominative) needs to be in the same case as the subject. This is typically the nominative case.
Just like the English verb to be, sum can also be followed by a prepositional phrase.
Equus erat in agrō. = The horse was in the field.
Vir rogāvit cūr librī in mēnsā nōn essent. = The man asked why the books weren’t on the table.
Existential Use of Sum
We often think of sum as simply meaning “to be,” but it can also mean “to exist.” Our English verb to be can also have this existential sense, as we shall soon see.
A classic example is René Descartes’ famous phrase:
Cogitō ergō sum. = I think therefore I am / exist.
But this usage shows up in more mundane situations, too. Forms of sum can be the equivalent of English phrases like “there is” and “there are.”
“There” is not translated into Latin. Just the verb is enough.
- est = there is
- sunt = there are
- erit / erunt = there will be
- erat = there was
- erant = there were
Take a look at the following example sentences and note the different ways that sum can be translated into English.
Sunt equī in agrō. = There are horses in the field.
Cūr est canis in sellā? = Why is there a dog on the chair?
Erant quī rēgem nōn amābant. = There were men who did not like the king. = Men existed who did not like the king.
Erit plūs pecūniae post bellum. = There will be more money after the war.
Sum as a helping verb
Sum can act as a helping verb, just like the verb to be can in English.
In English, for instance, you can say “the woman is working.” In this sentence, is isn’t acting as a linking verb or expressing existence. Instead, it is helping to convey the progressive nature of the woman’s action.
Is working is a verbal unit, which we would call the English “present progressive” tense.
Latin does not have a present progressive, but we can find the verb sum used to help create the passive voice of other Latin verbs. The perfect, pluperfect, and future perfect passive tenses are formed with sum and the perfect participle passive.
Here is a quick example with the 1st conjugation verb laudō “praise.” The 1st person singular perfect indicative passive form of laudō is laudātus sum.
On its own, laudātus means “having been praised.” When we combine it with sum, a super literal translation would be “I am having been praised,” i.e. I was praised at some point in the past.
This compound form should be translated as “I have been praised” or “I was praised.” As you can see, sum helps the participle to create the proper meaning.
If you are a beginning student, then you don’t need to worry about this at all yet. If you are more advanced, then be on the lookout for sum in passive forms!
Compound Verbs Built on Sum
The Latin verb to be can also form compound verbs. A prefix (usually a preposition) is added to the beginning of sum in order to change the meaning slightly.
One extremely common compound verb is possum, posse, potuī “be able, can.” It consists of the adjective potis “capable, able” plus sum.
Here are some other compound verbs formed from sum:
Verb | Meaning |
---|---|
absum, abesse, āfuī, āfutūrus | be away, absent (used with ab + ablative) |
adsum, adesse, adfuī, adfutūrus | be near, present |
dēsum, dēesse, dēfuī, dēfutūrus | be absent, lacking |
intersum, interesse, interfuī | be between, present; differ; be of interest |
praesum, praeesse, praefuī | preside over (+ dative) |
prōsum, prōdesse, prōfuī | be useful, benefit (+ dative) |
supersum, superesse, superfuī | remain; abound |
The good news is that all of these verbs have the exact same forms as sum, just with the relevant prefix added.
For prōsum, you insert a D between prō and the form of sum if the form begins with E (so, prōdes, prōdest, etc.).
Turris duo mīlia ab urbe abest. = The tower is two miles away from the city.
Mihi pecūnia dēerat. = Money was lacking for me (i.e. I was lacking money).
Hic liber tibi nōn prōderit. = This book will not be useful to you.
Why is the Latin verb sum so weird?
As we have seen, the conjugation of the verb to be in Latin is very irregular. My students often ask me why, and here’s what I tell them.
One cause of the irregularity is the fact that sum is a suppletive verb. Basically, this means that its forms go back to two entirely different roots.
The present system of sum derives from the Proto-Indo-European root *h1es- or *es- meaning “be”. We see es or just s surviving in the present tense (sum, es, etc.), while in the future (erō, eris, etc.) and the imperfect (eram, erās, etc.) the S has changed to an R between vowels.
The perfect system and the future participle, on the other hand, come from the Proto-Indo-European root *bhuhx– or *bheu- meaning “become” or “grow.” Eventually, the bh turns into f, and we end up with fuī, futūrus, and all the forms with fu.
The two roots *es- and *bheu- account for a lot of the confusion in the conjugation of sum.
Fun fact: the exact same thing has happened with the English verb to be. Am, are, and is come from *es-, while be, been, and being come from *bheu-. Was and were derive from a third stem, *wes- “remain, dwell.”
You may still be wondering: Why did this bizarre state of affairs occur? Historical linguistics has a lot to say on this topic, but here’s a quick answer. Basically, common words are more likely to be irregular.
Languages change over time, and irregularities in sound and form develop naturally. Over the generations speakers, just as naturally, tend to eliminate the irregularities to make words behave “normally.”
But this standardization does not happen as much with extremely common words. The reason is that speakers hear and use them constantly, so the irregular forms stick around.
The verb sum is the most frequently used verb in the Latin language, so it makes sense that its peculiarities have been preserved.
Frequently Asked Questions about the Latin Verb To Be
What conjugation is sum, esse?
Sum, esse is an irregular verb. This means that it does not belong to any of the four Latin verb conjugations. Instead, sum has its own unique forms in the present, imperfect, and future tenses.
Is sum active or passive?
Sum is neither active nor passive, because it is a linking verb. But it does use active personal endings, so it has more of an active flavor.
If you are parsing verbs for an assignment, ask your teacher for their preference. I tell my students they can either omit voice in the parsing of sum OR mark it as active.
Does sum have participles?
The Latin verb sum has one surviving participle: futūrus, a, um. Futūrus, which literally means “about to be” or “going to be”, is a future active participle.
Notice the familiar -ūrus ending, which signals the future active participle. The neuter futūrum “a thing about to be” is the source of the English word “future.”
What are the principal parts of the Latin verb to be?
The principal parts of sum “to be” are sum, esse, fuī, futūrus. Sum is the 1st person singular of the present indicative (“I am”). Esse is the present infinitive (“to be”). Fuī is the 1st person singular of the perfect indicative (“I was”). Futūrus is the future active participle (“about to be”).
What is the Latin verb for to be?
Sum, esse, fuī, futūrus is the Latin verb to be. If you want to translate the specific phrase “to be”, you should use the form esse. Esse is the present infinitive and thus means “to be” or “to exist.”
What is the difference between sum and est?
Sum is the first person singular form of the Latin verb to be and is translated as “I am.” Est is the third person singular and is translated as “he/she/it is.” Both forms are present tense and are extremely common, so you may see them even if you are a brand-new Latin learner.
Final Thoughts on the Verb To Be in Latin
Do you feel a bit more comfortable with the verb sum and its uses now? I hope so! This irregular verb shows up everywhere in Latin, so you will have lots of opportunities to test your new knowledge.
We have covered a lot of information in this post, so don’t worry if you are feeling overwhelmed. The most important thing to remember is that the verb sum is used in two main ways: first, as a linking verb (“to be”) and second, to express existence (“to exist”).
While you’re here, you may want to take a look at the following posts on learning Latin:
Awesome Resources for Latin Learners
Best Latin Dictionaries for Students
Long, long ago, I used “y’all” in my Latin classes. My instructor – an immigrant from a weird part of northern Italy that grew up speaking German – had never heard that word before and was absolutely delighted by it.
Hi Steve, I’m glad you were able to share the delight of this word with your instructor. I grew up in Georgia, so “y’all” has always been part of my vocabulary. My students love using it in class, no matter where they are from!
Thank you for this exposition. I wonder why we have “eram” and “fui” meaning “I was”. Interpreting “fui” as “I have been” is easier because that gives us two different words for two different meanings. How does “fui” come be “I was” as well as “I have been”?
Hi Fred, this is a great question. There are two parts to the answer, one which involves the peculiarities of Latin and the other the peculiarities of English.
First, the Latin perfect tense is hybrid in the sense that it combines two Proto-Indo-European tenses: the aorist (simple past) and the present perfect. So, a perfect like *vīdī* can mean both *I saw* (simple past) and *I have seen* (present perfect), and *laudāvī* can mean both *I praised* (simple past) and *I have praised* (present perfect). Latin uses one tense where in English we have two separate ones, and this is why *fuī* can mean both *I was* (simple past) and *I have been* (present perfect).
But why is *eram* (imperfect) ALSO translated as *I was*? This is because English doesn’t tend to distinguish between the simple past (e.g. I praised) and the past progressive (e.g. I was praising) in the verb *to be*. You could technically translate *eram* as *I was being* to get the imperfect aspect, but this sounds weird in English, so we just say *I was.*
I hope this makes sense. To summarize, *fuī*, when translated as *I was*, emphasizes the completion of the action/state of being. *Eram*, also translated as *I was*, emphasizes the ongoing nature of the action/state of being.
Thank You, Livia! I’m now wondering about the latin word “incolunt”, used famously by Caesar. It is translated everywhere as “inhabit” or “live in” (I think). I wonder whether there might be some additional nuance to this word, as it resembles colony or colonize, Might the word carry in addition to its simplistic translations the connotation of carrying a developed culture into a new place, or pursuing the practices of a developed culture (“living”) in a particular place?
I promise not to inundate you with further questions of this sort. After reading this I think my real question has to do with whether Latin writers/speakers employ nuance as we do in English. I think the answer must be yes. I guess it will take a great deal of reading followed by writing in Latin for me to truly understand the language. Getting ahead of myself…
Hello again, Fred! This is a great question – ‘incolō’ comes from the verb ‘colō’, which originally meant “cultivate” or “till.” So the basic meaning is agricultural, something like “pursue farming practices in a given place.” This is where the relationship with ‘colony’ and ‘colonize’ comes in.
And to answer your second question: yes, Latin writers/speakers definitely employ nuance. In my opinion, one of the most fun parts of learning a new language is discovering all the little distinctions and shades of meaning.